Felani’s killer acquited: Rationalists’ and Humanists’ Forum of India Condemns the verdict

felani The lone accused of the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) in the case of killing a 15-year old Bangladeshi girl Felani Khatun was acquitted on Thursday September 5, 2013 by a BSF court.
The court pronounced the verdict, saying that Indian border guard Amiya Ghosh, the only accused in the killing of Felani, had pleaded “not guilty”.
Although the verdict is yet to be declared officially, Amiya Ghosh has already been released.
According to media reports, the verdict is subject to the approval of the competent authorities of the BSF. This is the first time any member of Indian Border Security Force has been tried for killing a Bangladeshi national.
Havildar Amiya Ghosh of 181 battalion was indicted by the BSF for “unintentionally killing” Felani when she was crossing the Bangladesh-India border at Anantapur point in Kurigram along with her father in January, 2011.
On January 7, 2011, Felani was shot by BSF in the chest and died on the spot. After the killing, her body was kept hanging from the barbed wire, as her clothes got entangled with it. The horrific image of Felani’s hanging body drew condemnations from all over the world.
After mounting pressure from different quarters, the Indian authorities finally started the trial on August 13, 2013 — more than two and a half years after Felani’s murder.
Felani’s father, who travelled to Cooch Behar to testify in the case, outright rejected the verdict and vowed to take the matter to the International Court.
“If the news of not guilty verdict for Amiya Ghosh is correct, then it is not a right verdict. The BSF killed my daughter who was brought home for marriage,” said Nurul Islam, Felani’s father.
“My family is deeply shocked. I want justice. I urge the government to ensure justice for my girl,” he said adding, “If needed I will take up the case to the International court.”
“It was a clear case of murder. There were witnesses. Our expectation was that the maximum penalty will be awarded to the accused,” he said, adding, “It was an opportunity for the Indians to right a wrong.”
Kurigram public prosecutor Advocate Abraham Lincoln, who accompanied Felani’s father to Cooch Behar, expressed his dismay at the verdict, saying, “This will encourage border killings by the BSF members.”
The judge of the one-member special court, SK Srivastava, also inspector- general of the BSF’s Guwahati frontier, began the trial at the BSF 181 battalion headquarters in India’s Cooch Behar amid restrictions on August 13.
When Felani was returning from India with her father Nurul Islam Nuru she was fatally shot at Anantapur along Kurigram border. Although her father had crossed over to Bangladesh, Felani’s clothes got entangled in the barbed-wire and BSF guards gunned her down.
The bullet-riddled body of the 15-year-old dangled from the fence for nearly five hours. She was reportedly alive for at least four hours. Local people said Felani had asked for water before bleeding to death.
Later, the BSF members took the body down, tied her hands and feet to a bamboo pole and carried her away. Felani’s body was handed over to her family the next day.
Photographs of the dead body, dangling from the barbed-wire fence, evoked widespread criticism and protests, forcing India to apologise to Bangladesh.
On August 18, a Bangladeshi team had travelled to India to testify before a special court. The team consisted of Felani’s father Nuru and uncle Abdul Hanif, public prosecutor of the Kurigram district judge’s court SM Abraham Lincoln and Lt. Ziaul Haque Khaled of the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) 45 Battalion.
Before their departure, Felani’s family members offered fateha at the grave of Felani and prayed for justice.
The BSF headquarters, on BGB’s insistence, formed the general security force court to punish those responsible for the incident after an investigation. After the investigation, the BSF submitted a charge-sheet in the case, stating that its member, Amiya Ghosh, had killed Felani with his 5.56 mm Insas rifle.
Ghosh was charged under Section 304 (unintentional killing) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 146 of the BSF Act.
On August 13, a one-man special court of the Indian border force began the trial of the killing of Felani Khatun about two years and eight months after the incident. Five BSF officers, led by Guwahati frontier DIG CP Trivedi, conducted the trial at its outpost number 181.
Meanwhile, “Masum,” an Indian human rights organisation working on border killings, termed the verdict “an injustice in the name of justice,” according to a report of BBC Bangla Service.
Kirity Roy, chief of the organisation, said firstly it was a denial of justice and secondly the right to life guaranteed by the Indian Constitution was violated through the verdict since Felani was shot dead within Indian Territory.
They are also thinking to lodge a case before the High Court or the Supreme Court of India challenging the verdict.

RATIONALIST’ AND HUMANISTS FORUM OF INDIA CONDEMNS THE VERDICT.

Rationalists’ and Humanists’ Forum of India Condemns the verdict for acquitting the killer. We are strongly protesting and condemning the mock trial of Bangladeshi unfortunate girl Felani, who had been brutally murdered by the Indian border guard, BSF. Indian authority recently held a trial of mockery of this murder that slapped the world conscience and human rights. Every humanist of the world along with the victim family of Felani have vehemently rejected the perverse verdict of this trial of mockery.

By holding this trial of mockery, the Indian government has proved that to them the life of the people has no worth. This trial would give license to the Indian border guard, BSF to kill the innocent Bengali civilians in the frontier area indiscriminately. BSF is the real killer of Felani and as the judges and the court belongs to India; so they defended their citizen. The real and fair trial of this murder would stop the border killing. But this verdict will inspire the killers and the number of the border killings will be increased more as consequence.

By: Debashis

Courtesy: The independent

10 comments on “Felani’s killer acquited: Rationalists’ and Humanists’ Forum of India Condemns the verdict

  1. MedMoiree says:

    Keep up your fight against violation of human rights. my solidarity.

  2. winhammea says:

    this is vehement. thanks for sharing.

  3. Arif Hussain says:

    বাংলাদেশে এখন সরকার সমর্থক বা সরকার অনুগত মিডিয়ার রাজ্বত্ব চলছে। এখানে প্রায় সকল বিরোধী মিডিয়াকে (প্রিন্ট ও ইলেকট্রনিক) জোরপূর্বক বন্ধ করে দেয়া হয়েছে। সেক্ষেত্রে সরকার সমর্থক মিডিয়ার রাজ্যে আপনার এই অসামান্য blogti অ্যাভয়েড করতে পারলে মিডিয়া হাউসগুলোর সুবিধা হয়।

    যদিও আপনার lekhati হতভাগ্য সেইসব মানুষদের kotha যারা সীমান্তে মানবতের জীবন যাপন করছে। সবচেয়ে বড় কথা, একজন Indian সরাসরি তার সরকারের প্রকাশ্য বিপক্ষে অবস্থান নিচ্ছে। যাইহোক, আপনার এই lorai দুই দেশের সীমান্ত নিয়ে কাজ করা মানবাধিকার প্রতিষ্ঠানগুলোর স্টেটমেন্ট হয়ে উঠুক, এই কামনা করি।

  4. Porna Tamanna says:

    Priyo Arif,
    asha kori ei lekha tomar chokhe porbe. Koekti kotha bolar icche hocche.
    1. Juktibadi Debashis aj porjonto kono lekha lekhen ni media’r drishti akorshoner jonno, ba mediya’y procharer jonno. kono bishesh media jodi tader kono lekha chape, seta onyo kotha. tNar lekha buker moddhey kore banchiye rakhar jonno tar bohu pathok bhokto ache, jar moddhey tumio acho.
    2. tomar protiti kotha uriye dite parchina. tumi ‘jei media’ gulor bondher kotha bolcho, tara ki niropekkho chilo? tader prokash kora khobor gulo ki bhishonbhabe ekta kul rokkharthe toiri kora hoynai!?
    3. thik jemni bhabe, muktijuddher shomoyer lekhagulo amader 71 e pran jugiyeche, jerokom Bande ma taram, ekhono gaye kanta dey, emonki ei obharotiyo amakeo. Juktibadi Debashis er lekha ameke onek bhorsha jugiyeche. khub priyo ekjon manush onek dur theke amader shathe achen, ei bujhtukui amader jonno onek joruri.
    4. tomar shorkar jokhon ashbe, (dhore nicchi ei shorkar tomar na, tomar mot thekei), tokhon tarao tader mot i prochar korben, etaro byatikrom hobena. …… amar kono kothar uttor dite hobena, tumi nijer mone nijeke shottita bolo, ami tomar bondhu, tomar moner kotha ami thik bujhe nebo. amra shob ondhotto theke mukto hoi!

  5. Ipsita sulema Nargis says:

    BoRoi rajnoitik ! e bishoygulo eRiye jawai bhalo! ei kothay vabchen Bharoter agun khawa budhijibi ra. Tai tnara sobai nirob. Debashis, apni ekjon ujjol batikrom, ekjon sotti karer manobotabadi jnar manobota bodh k knatatar er bera diye atke rakha jay na. apnar sahosh er kache matha noyatei hoy. Bhalo thakun.

  6. Afreen Shampa says:

    Ami Bangla bhalobasi,banglike bhalobasi,kobita bhalobasi,ar Juktibadi Debashis ke bhalobasi. Ata amar gorbo. Debashis, Osadharon apni r apnar somoyupojogi kormo…banglar manusher buker majhe jome thaka bedona emon bhabe futiye tolar jonno dhonnobad.

  7. Arpita florence says:

    Thank you for your support to Felani.

  8. Pakhi Kulsum Mollick says:

    Ami bhebechilam Poshchim Banglae bhodro manusher bash, kintu eikhane Emon baje galagali shune, khubi hotash holam. Apnra jamatider motoi kotha bolsen. Bangladesh jokhon mondir bhangge tokhon amra shobai protibaad kori, aar Debashis toh shob kisu Omanobikotar protibaad koren, falani k niye lekhay jolsen naki shotto kothae apnader Gaye gha legese? Bjp aar bnp Jamat je Bhai-Bhai, shudhu duto alada dhormo..

    @Subimal Bondopadhyay… Apnar kase manobota Indian na Bangladeshi?!! Hindu na Muslim?!! Charal na Bramhon?!! Konta?!! Aajke apnake Jodi falanir moto morte hoe?!! Amra shobai taar protibaad korbo. Manobotar kono desh-jati thakle amake janaben doya kore.

    @Debashis… Ami gorbito tomake valobese….ami lojjito tader jonno jara tomake nongra kotha bole..ami dukkhito jara kichhui na kore shudhu somalochnai shukh pai..tomar lekhoni akkhoi hok…

  9. EDITOR says:

    Because of the abusive language used by Subimal Bandapadhyay, his comment is deleted.

  10. Manik Banerjee says:

    ১৯৫১ সালের সেন্সান অনুসারে পশ্চিম
    বঙ্গে হিন্দুদের সংখ্যা ছিল–৭৯.৪০%।
    মুসলমানদের সংখ্যা ছিল–১৮.৬৩%।
    ২০০১ সালে হিন্দুদের সংখ্যা হয়েছে–৭২.৯০%।
    মুসলমানদের সংখ্যা হয়েছে ২৫.৩৭%।
    _______________ _______________ ___
    বাংলাদেশে ১৯৫১ সালে হিন্দুদের সংখ্যা ছিল
    ৩৮%।
    মুসলমানদের সংখ্যা ছিল ৬২%।
    ২০০১ সালে হিন্দুদের সংখ্যা হয়েছে ৯%।
    মুসলমানদের সংখ্যা ৯১%।
    _______________ _______________ ____
    গত ৫০ বছরে পশ্চিমবঙ্গে সংখ্যালঘু
    হিসেবে মুসলমানদের সংখ্যা কমেনি তো বটেই–
    বরং বেড়েছে। আর বাংলাদেশে সংখ্যালঘু
    হিসেবে হিন্দুদের
    সংখ্যা কমতে কমতে তলানীতে গিয়ে ঠেকেছে।
    কী অদ্ভুত পরিস্থিতি!
    _______________ _______________ ______________
    বাংলাদেশে হিন্দুরা ১৯৪৭ সাল থেকে হিন্দু
    হিসেবে নয়–মানুষ হিসেবে–নাগরিক
    হিসেবে বাঁচতে চেয়েছে।
    একাত্তরে মরতে মরতে সর্বস্ব
    হারিয়ে দেশছাড়া হয়েও আবার নাগরিক
    হিসেবে বাঁচতেই ফিরে এসেছে। এখানে তাদের
    দেশপ্রেমের কোনো ঘাটতি নেই।
    পাকিস্তানের চিত্রটা দেখা যাক–
    _______________ _____
    ১৯৫১ সালে হিন্দুদের সংখ্যা ছিল ৩.৩%।
    ১৯৯৮ সালে সেটা হয়েছে ১.৬%।
    অর্থাৎ পাকিস্তানে হিন্দুদের
    সংখ্যাটা আধাআধি কমেছে।

    কুলদা রায়

    স্বাধীনতার এত বছর পরেও বাংলাদেশের হিন্দুরা চরম অত্যাচারিত হচ্ছে, ঘর বাড়ী, মন্দির, মানুষ জালিয়ে দেওয়া হচ্ছে, জোর করে ধরমান্তকরণ করা হচ্ছে…, নোংরা ভাষায় আক্রমন করা হচ্ছে…”

Leave a comment